The Stupidity Of The Gospel Of Thomas? Really?

I was recently watching some videos by pastor Anderson. He makes many good points about many issues.

But unfortunately, when he sets out to defame the Gospel of Thomas, he does himself and Jesus a disservice.

Paster Anderson overlooks that in the early stages of the Vatican’s rule, it waged holy war on authentic Christian sects. These were aware of the teachings Jesus gave his initiates, which were different from what he told the multitude.

These texts were lost because of this long term repression.

Anderson is limited by the ungodly notion that the Bible is the Word of God. Jesus Christ is the Word of God, not the Bible.

He thus cannot rationally discuss how the Bible came about, or that it was at the time what the Vatican pressed on the Christian world with pure power politics and the manufacturing of ‘consensus’.

In this vid Anderson sets out to ‘destroy’ Jesus’ sayings in the Gospel of Thomas and he does so in a way showing his utter lack of real spiritual knowledge.

Let’s mention them point for point:
verse 114: “Simon Peter said to him, Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life. Jesus said: I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so she too may become a living spirit like you males. For every woman who makes herself male will enter the Kingdom of Heaven’.

Jesus here refers to the earthly nature of women, who therefore have more difficulty observing Source, consciousness, Him. They are more obsessed with passion and desire and this is the main enemy of spiritual awareness. However, women can learn to overcome this ‘by becoming male’, less identified with the lower chakras.

Verse 15. Jesus said: when you see one who was not born of woman, prostrate yourselves on your face before him, and worship him. That one is your father.’

The idea here is, that he who is reborn in the Spirit, is no longer of the flesh and thus ‘not born of woman’. He who knows the Spirit, knows the Father.

Verse 30: Jesus said: where there are three Gods, they’re Gods. When there are two or one, I’m with them.

This one I don’t completely understand. I do have an idea though: Christianity knows two Gods, who are basically one: The Father, who is in heaven, and the Son, the Word, Logos, who is the Creator (at the behest of the Father) and is in His Creation and who is known as our Lord Jesus Christ.

More than two Gods (father and son) is the polytheism of antiquity.

Verse 37: His disciples said: When will you become revealed to us, and when shall we see you? Jesus said: When you disrobe, without being ashamed and take up your garments and place them under your feet like little children and tread on them.

This harkens back to Krishna, who in the Baghavad Gita said that death is nothing but putting off old clothes.

Our Garments here represent self. The human condition is, that identification with self (mind, emotion, desire, body) hinders our view of the Spirit.

Verse 42: Jesus said: become passers by.

Anderson sadly really laughs hard about this one, making fun of such a ‘meaningless’ statement.

What is said here is the same as ‘be in this world, but not of it’.

Those how live in the Spirit are not identified with the material, which just flows through them without them clinging to it.

Verse 53: His disciples said to him: is circumcision beneficial or not? Jesus said: if it were beneficial, their Father would beget them already circumcised from their mother.

Well, it couldn’t be more clear, really. And this is fully congruent with the New Testament too, so I don’t really understand why Anderson would make fun of this.

Jesus said: He who drinks from my mouth will become like me. I myself shall become he. And the things that are hidden will become revealed to him.

It’s really sad Anderson mocks this, because this is the profound promise of the Spirit. ‘Drinking from my mouth’ is similar figure of speech like ‘eat my bread, drink my water’ etc.

What this refers to is that he that lives with the Spirit, silencing self, just being with Him, in the Holy Place, will be ‘reformed’ (like Paul wrote) and will receive the fruit of the Spirit. Profound insight comes to those who go deeper and deeper into the Mystery of the Spirit in personal surrender and communion. This is an eternal path, as the Spirit is endless and shares His endless bounty with those who go all the way in shedding their Garments and become like little Children.

So it’s not all so incredibly complicated. These are fundamental spiritual realities and most can be directly linked to things Jesus said in the New Testament.

The Gospel of Thomas doubtlessly provides the honest seeker with good wisdom to contemplate in prayer and meditation.

Worship not Jesus, but the Spirit he incarnated!

Copernicus And His Kabbalistic Methods

As we can see, Copernicus had some interesting opinions on the scientific method.

Reality is not important. Just lay down a nice hypothesis and say: ‘you can’t prove yours and I can’t prove mine, therefore both are equally valid’.

This is the essence of Kabbalistic thought, upon which the powerful build their solipsism. This is the foundational thought of magick, where ‘truth’ becomes a personal experience.

This is how they manipulate not reality itself, but our perception of it.

However, we have a useful tool in these matters: Occam’s razor, which states that when faced with choice, the simplest one is usually the best.

And it’s clear that both at the time and today, Occam’s razor gives clear preference to Tychonic Geocentrism and not to Heliocentrism, which cannot explain why we are not observing stellar parallax.

These quotes are really very telling about a man who is known to have been heavily involved in groups around Platonic mysticism in Bologna. Plato had maintained the Sun was the most exalted in the observable world.

Wrote Copernicus:
“In the middle of all sits Sun enthroned. In this most beautiful temple could we place this luminary in any better position from which he can illuminate the whole at once? He is rightly called the Lamp, the Mind, the Ruler of the Universe….”

As we can see, it’s rather one sided to blame Catholics, Protestants and ‘Bible Believers’ for a religious agenda behind Geocentrism.

Because the ‘spiritual’ agenda behind Heliocentrism is quite blatant and comparing both camps it is clear that the X-tians have shown a great deal more respect for the scientific method than the Sun worshippers of Heliocentrism.

Let alone Tycho Brahe, who was a great and impeccable scientist who showed proper respect for the observable data and restraint in coming to conclusions.

Heliocentrism Is Dead. There Is No Stellar Parallax!

Heliocentrism Is Dead. There Is No Stellar Parallax!

Copernicus was a Sun worshipper who had been studying Platonic mysticism, which claimed the Sun was the highest in the observable Universe. It was this that drove him in his quest for Heliocentricity, at the cost of the facts.

Copernicus was a Sun worshipper who had been studying Platonic mysticism, which claimed the Sun was the highest in the observable Universe. It was this that drove him in his quest for Heliocentrism, at the cost of the facts.

Heliocentrism, the long standing belief that the Earth revolves around the Sun, is dead.

The key evidence for it, stellar parallax, does not exist. The implications of this stunning fact are enormous. Not only does this end Heliocentrism as a viable system, it also ends our ideas about the distance of the stars.

Tycho Brahe has been right all this time. The Sun revolves around the Earth and the Earth is the center of the Universe.

Do you not believe me? I don’t blame you. The implications are enormous.

But allow me to explain what is going on.

Historical context
Throughout antiquity and the Medieval era, Geocentrism had been the norm. Ptolemy was the great sage of this idea and his system, which claimed that all celestial bodies circle the Earth, was generally accepted as the standard.

However, already in antiquity, astronomers were starting to have doubts, as they were suspecting the Planets, Mercury and Venus in particular, were circling the Sun.

By the time of the late Middle Ages, it was becoming clear that the Planets were indeed circling the Sun and that the Ptolemaic system needed a serious update to accomodate this.

Then Copernicus published his famous ‘Revolutionibus’ in 1543, describing the orbit of the Planets around the Sun.

However, Copernicus did a whole lot more than just that: he also put the Earth in an orbit around the Sun.

And this was a wild leap of the imagination, which was absolutely not warranted with the available evidence.

In the first place, astronomy had always seen the Planets as simply wandering stars, luminiscent spheres on the firmament, only different from the other stars because they were moving, unlike the others.

To suddenly claim the Earth was just another Planet was not at all uncontroversial, and it still isn’t.

Secondly, we should be witnessing stellar parallax when the Earth circles the Sun.

If the Earth is orbiting the Sun, then this should show in relative movements of closer and further away stars.

If the Earth is orbiting the Sun, then this should show in relative movements of closer and further away stars.

Parallax is what we see when we drive by a landscape and closer by objects seem to  be moving more quickly than those further off.

Stellar parallax, then, should result from the movements of the Earth. Closer stars should show relative motion compared to further away stars.

And this was simply not being observed at the time.

However, Copernicus and his followers explained this away by saying that the Stars were simply too far away for the effect to be observed.

In doing so, he also laid the foundation for the insane size of the Universe that ‘science’ nowadays claims. The Universe has been ballooning immensely, since the days of the Copernicus…

It is for these reasons that Tycho Brahe published his ‘An Introduction to the New Astronomy’ in 1588, proposing a Geocentric, Neo-Ptolemaic system, where the Sun revolves around the Earth and the Planets around the Sun.

The Tychonic system is simpler than the Copernican one and definitely fitted the observable evidence of the time better than Heliocentrism. It still does today.

By explaining away the lack of stellar parallax, Copernicus was in fact not in accordance with Occam’s razor, which claims that the simplest solution is usually best.

However, the Tychonic and Copernican Systems would compete with each other for centuries. The reason for this is mainly that, for some mysterious reason of their own, Kepler, Galileo and Newton, would all three support Heliocentrism.

As a result, their fame based on their own achievements, would rub off on Heliocentrist credibility.

And this was not warranted, because Kepler’s elliptical orbits, Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s moons and Newton’s laws of gravity, fit equally well with the Tychonic as the Copernican system!

This point is really very vital to understand the history of the Heliocentric deception.

Stellar Parallax…..or?
Then in 1838 something remarkable happened: Friedrich Bessel for the first time observed star movement. Shortly thereafter a number of stars were observed moving on the firmament relatively to other stars.

This in itself was an interesting achievement, a testament to improving telescopes.

However, Bessel and his contemperaries quickly jumped to the conclusion that this must be the stellar parallax that they had been looking for ever since Copernicus, no less than three centuries.

But this was most likely a premature conclusion. After all: parallax is the seeming movement of closer by stars relatively to further away ones as the result of the Earth orbitting the Sun.

The fact is that the star movements that Bessel and colleagues observed, might have been caused by other reasons.

However, by the authority of their great predecessors, astronomers and physicists were heavily invested in Heliocentrism, even though the Tychonic system was, by all available evidence, still the preferable system.

As a result, Bessel’s observations were quickly jumped upon as having finally settled the issue and everybody rested assured Heliocentrism was a fact.

This led to some horrible disasters later on, most notably the Michelson-Morley catastrophy, culminating in the mystique of ‘relativity’ and a wasted century for astronomy. We’ll come back to that later.

Meanwhile, ‘stellar parallax’ was considered a given and ever since mainly a proud member of science’s hall of fame.

However, since these days astronomers have been faithfully logging the movements on the firmament of hundreds of thousands of stars.

And now comes the great kicker: it transpires that about half of the logged stars show ‘parallax’ (or at any rate, movement). But about half of each move in opposite directions!

This is called positive and negative stellar parallax.

However: if we are indeed witnessing stellar parallax as a result of the Earth’s orbit around the sun, all parallax should be in the same direction!

As a result we must conclude that the movement of the stars that we have been measuring ever since Bessel does NOT validate Copernican Heliocentrism, but IS consistent with Brahe’s System.

Furthermore, we cannot call these stars’ movements parallax at all. Because if these movements were caused by moves in the firmament, a result of the stars spinning around the Earth, or vice versa, all movement should still be in the same direction.

We must conclude that the movement that we are seeing is caused by other factors, and cannot be called stellar parallax at all.

And this also means that all our calculations of the distance of the stars are rubbish too.

And this brings us full circle, because it was Copernicus himself who began the insane blowing up of the Universe, based on nothing but speculation.

We have been had. On a scale that is truly hard to fathom.

The scientific community is guilty of covering up an immense scandal: that hundreds of thousands of confirmed star movements refute stellar parallax and therefore Copernican Heliocentrism. Nobody dares touch this stuff, while it sits there sticking out like a very sore thumb indeed.

This is far from the only example of a huge cover up. The fact is that our entire ‘science’ based world view is a fraud of truly monumental proportions.

Here is another example before we close off. While Earthbound observation of the Sun can probably never conclusively show whether the Sun circles the Earth or vice versa, NASA should theoretically be able to do just that. Presumably, they are scouting the solar system as we speak and it should be a piece of cake to have one of their satellites monitor the Sun’s orbit (or the Earth’s). They would only need a few months worth of data to prove the point.

Why, do you reckon, has this not happened?

The implications of the shattering of such a paradigm are momentous and we leave the reader to ponder both them and the here presented evidence…

Feminism is dying

Emma Watson

(Above: The UN thought it sly to put a young starlet in front of millions with some particularly pathetic talking points. As a result she was widely ridiculed on the web.)

Feminism has quietly lost all support from women, except perhaps those brainwashed in University.

By Anthony Migchels, for Henry Makow.

In 2012 a major study was published, showing that women across the board are disentchanted with it. They consider it ‘too agressive against men’, ‘old fashioned’, ’70 per cent of younger women feel far too much is expected of them, with unprecedented pressure to ‘be red-hot lovers, domestic goddesses, climb the career ladder and look like supermodels’.

But the real knock out is: “The majority of the 1,300 polled felt feminism should be about ensuring women have ‘real choice over their family, career and lives’, and to reinstate the value of motherhood.”

It is exactly this sentiment that Feminism was designed to destroy.

According to Simone de Beauvoir, a disturbed woman, like most of the Feminists that were unleashed on an unwitting public by the Rockefeller Foundation, put it this way:
“No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.””

And the trend is long term: the number of stay-at-home moms has been slowly rising over the last decade, after a calamitous free fall in the seventies and eighties. True, after tanking the labor market by flooding it with millions of cheap, easily manipulable wage slaves (‘independent women’), this is nowadays a tough proposition for many families. It’s now very difficult to run a family on one wage. Still the trend is clear and remarkable.

While the arty farty ‘liberal’ (Cultural Marxist) MSM is still parading ridiculous little whores like the above in front of the masses, claiming of this particular wench that she is ‘redefining beauty’, the real story is on the Web: the men’s movement has hammered feminism on-line and the ‘Social Justice Warriors’ are constantly on the defensive. Their insane man hatred (which is the core of Feminism) is being exposed more and more.

Every time they are confronted with coherent argumentation, they immediately succumb to narcissist breakdowns, claiming ‘people like you are why the world is such a mess’, or ‘fucking dickhead’. Clearly indicating lack of arguments, manners and most likely mental stability.

The SJW’s still manage to destroy careers, like recently PGA President Ted Bishop, after he said a golfer behaved like ‘a little girl’. That comparing a man with a little girl could be considered insulting is still hard to fathom for the little girls that currently control the debate.

But the real story is in the comments of for instance this article: the public clearly sees this is unacceptable.

At the moment, Gamer Gate is thrashing the feminist controlled Media via their on-line outlets, particularly, which is also a hotbed of agitation against the ‘Domestic Violence’ hoax.

Domestic violence is mainly perpetrated by women and it has been well known since at the least the seventies that the best shot that women have to avoid violence against them is……..refraining from violence against their mates: no less than two thirds of ‘battered women’ admit committing ‘severe violence’ against their husband before getting a taste of their own medicine.

Gamer Gate has such fall out, that major corporate sponsors are starting to see that Feminism is not about women’s rights, but is actually attacking their main consumer base: men.

“Perhaps it won’t surprise you to learn that microchip manufacturers and car companies are pretty sympathetic to the concerns of male consumers. But some of the things said to me–all, sadly, on condition of anonymity–have been nothing short of remarkable.

There’s the Intel vice president who told me via email that GamerGate was “doing great work” and that he was “sick of slander and self-loathing from the press”. He was talking about male journalists who do misandrist feminists’ work for them.”

In another funny development, Fox News Host Kimberly Guilfoyle, openly stated on TV, that young women should not vote and should not be on juries, but instead should be buying shoes and keeping an eye out on

While this is an obvious statement for anyone born before 1930 or otherwise endowed with some basic understanding of human nature, it’s a far cry from what has become the norm in our completely pussified society, ruled by girly ‘sensitivities’.

After getting scorched by the Left, she did not at all recant, and her co-host, a former press secretary at the White House, simply chimed in agreeing with her.

It’s not really surprising that women are saying this: they tend to be accutely aware of the nonsensical pussy worship that so many men are mind controlled into. Women are well known to prefer male bosses, for instance.

Women, more than anybody else, know about the female darkside.

While Feminism and Cultural Marxism is taking a heavy beating on the Web, the MSM is clutching at straws to fend off the inevitable. But this only hastens their own demise.

Meanwhile, many among the men’s movement, including major outlets like, are taking a wholly wrong turn by joining the Feminists in clamoring for ‘equality’, pointing at egregious inequality before the law, for instance in family courts, or punishment for men and women for the same offenses.

But there is no equality. Men are more spiritual, more rational, have a bigger brain and are simply much more powerful than women. Women are more earthly, emotional and have a womb.

Men want to possess their women and women want to be possessed. The male longing to possess her proves to her that she is wanted and desired. This also explains why by far most women are submissive in bed.

We can have something much better than equality: Male Privilege and Female Privilege.

We can have love.

Rapes In India: What’s Behind The Media Outrage?
Cultural Marxism: Managing The Ant Farm


More On Feminism In India

Indian gals on the warpath.......

Indian gals on the warpath…….

India court says women ‘misusing’ dowry law

Recently we were analyzing that the sudden hype of Indian rape stories were probably part of an orchestrated feminist attack on Indian society.

It now transpires that the feminist police state is already quite developed there. In an effort to clamp down on dowry deaths (men marrying women for the dowry and then disposing of them), incredibly restrictive laws were implemented. Men AND their families are immediately arrested on any complaint.

The predictable result: disgruntled wives file complaints simply to teach hubby a lesson.

In India there is bound to be a huge difference between the country- and city dwellers and these ‘one size fits all’ nightmare Statist intrusions always lead to more problems than they actually solve.

There is always an intricate balance of power between the spouses. Women usually rule, even if there is nominal male dominance. The reason is simple: women maintain more and better relations in the family and direct vicinity. Men are more solitary. The network effect gives women easy dominance.

With the brotherhood of men now completely defunct in the West, men are hopelessly outnumbered, as they quickly find out when getting married (let alone divorced, once the matriarchy is done with them). I’m not sure what the situation is in rural India, perhaps men there still cooperate to keep the women in line.

But the idea that women are hapless victims is really so 2013. Even in male dominated societies, women still have plenty of scope to live out their own traumas and usually they show less restraint in doing so than men. They’re just less powerful, but when the State sides with them and the woman can use State power to project her dismay, great problems are automatic.

This is not to say that there are no problems with women’s rights, particularly in rural India, it’s just pointing out that in addressing these problems, a realistic attitude about female nature and the male/female dynamic is necessary.

The State simply has no business in family life and no scope at all to do any good.

The Insane Tyranny Of Britain’s Child ‘Protection’ Services

Martin Cardinal, the soulless monster enforcing Britain's demonic family laws

Martin Cardinal, the soulless monster enforcing Britain’s demonic family laws

The Mothers Jailed For Waving To Their Children

Where is the outrage? How is it possible that we have degenerated to such depths? Why cannot people see what insane tyranny is already the norm?

British Child ‘Protection’ (snatching) Agencies are the worst in the world, rivaled only by Dutch Jeugd’zorg’. But even for their standards, this story is truly horrendous.

Mothers incarcerated for waving to their children they happen to meet in the streets……..I kid you not, Christopher Booker writes he knows at least of six cases of these.

A 72 year old Grandmother jailed for three months (!!!!!!) after lovingly embracing her granddaughter. The judge had the gal to actually say: “I am sure this grandmother needs restraint.”

The same ghoul, Martin Cardinal, had already made waves after secretly (!!!!), yes, secretly, family courts are secret in Britain, and the victims gagged, “jailed Wanda Maddocks – for removing her 80-year-old father from a care home where he had been placed by social workers, and where he was being so ill-treated that she feared for his life.”

When loving parents or grandparents are allowed to see their (grand)children, it is with insanely draconian limitations on what they can discuss. They can only talk in English:

“No reference can be made to the courts, social workers or any other “professional” involved in the case. Particularly forbidden is any “whispering”. Where foreign children are in care, they and their parents are forbidden to use the language they speak at home. When a Lithuanian grandfather recently flew to London to see his grandson, he was merely allowed one five-minute video exchange on Skype, using the only three words of English he knew: “I love you”.”

It’s heartbreaking and the cruelty of these maniacal State psychopaths is heart and mind numbing. The rage I feel when thinking of these people is immense.

I just can’t believe the restraint people suffering from this insane tyranny (and I know it first hand) show. Yes, they will commit suicide or even kill their own children in total panic.

But they never kill these soulless State perpetrators. Why has no judge been taken down? How is it possible nobody has taken revenge on these heartless monsters? Of course, it’s a great achievement spiritually, but sometimes I really wonder how far it must go before these criminals are held personally accountable.

They should be the ones living in fear, not parents and children.

Ann Coulter And The Female Vote

"It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted." ~Ann Coulter

“It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 – except Goldwater in ’64 – the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted.” ~Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter certainly is one of the more sour witches out there today. The left loves to hate her and with good reason.

But her point is interesting and it can be heard more often in some circles, also by other women.

Does universal suffrage work? Probably not.

It’s not just about women (although the female vote is probably not beneficial), but also the young.

The basic idea behind universal suffrage is that voting is a right. But it is not: it’s a responsibility for a fairly important societal function and it is quite obvious that not all are equally capable of voting reasonably.

At the moment in the United States 55% of the vote is female. While women receive more from the State then they pay in taxes. So men pay more than 100% of all taxation, but they are represented by only 45% of the vote. Clearly this is wrong.

To put it very bluntly: men are picking up the tab for what women were fooled into voting for. The US offically left the British Empire because of taxation without representation.

The female vote has seen the rise of the all pervading nanny State during the 20th century. Women are more collectivist and more susceptible to Government propaganda (and commercial marketing too).

Women are certainly not more ‘peaceful’ as witnessed by the rampage the US Empire has been on during the era of universal suffrage.

Occasionally we also hear about giving the vote to younger people. Here’s the agenda as described in the Protocols:
“To secure this we must have everybody vote without distinction of classes and qualifications, in order to establish an absolute majority, which cannot be got from the educated propertied classes.”

The problem with young people voting is obvious: they’re clueless. Also, they’re still very dependent society and not yet very productive.

How could the system be reformed? Perhaps it’s a good idea to have only heads of households older than 30 vote.

People living alone would be able to vote, women too. People living in families would decide among themselves who is the ‘head of the household’. This would probably normally be the man, and sometimes the woman. The head of the household would vote for the entire family, where each child is half a vote and each adult a full vote. A family of four with two children would thus have three votes, casted by the ‘head of the household’, who would vote according to his own conscience with the interests of his family in mind.

This would solve the problem of the female majority and inexperienced people voting.

Rapes In India: What’s Behind The Media Outrage?

Is rape in India being used to poison the women there with feminism too?

Is rape in India being used to poison the women there with feminism too?

Recently, the world has been shaken by a number of reports from India about terrible rape cases.

A number of women have been raped and murdered, or committed suicide out of shame.

The events are very brutal. But the question is: why are we being bombarded by these stories all of the sudden?

India is a huge country with an area similar to the US and about 3,5 times the population. Most of these people live in squalor.

Are these rapes, bad as they are, really so stunning that they deserve all this attention all of the sudden? Are there no worse things happening in India?

Rape has always been used by feminism. Everybody hates rape, so it is a useful theme to promote their social engineering agenda.

Feminist maniacs have been badgering us with totally fabricated ‘rape culture’ smears for years now. It is poisoning women’s minds, shaming men and used for ever more draconian feminist legislation against men and the family.

Women’s ‘rights’ are used by the UN and its owners everywhere in the world to ‘manage female fertility’ (depopulate the planet) and to attack men who could resist the collectivist designs of Government and supranational entities.

Considering the unisono, global media ‘outrage’, my hunch is India is facing a feminist attack.

Make No Mistake: ‘Equality’ Is Genocide
‘Lift The Skirt’, Or: The Last Days Of Feminism


Atheism: Primitive.

Atheism cannot solve the problems of religion

Atheism cannot solve the problems of religion

Atheism is the most primitive of belief systems.

It claims ‘science’ and ‘logic’ ‘prove’ God does not exist. A total logical fallacy, as obviously God is not material and science is only interested in, and can only observe material ‘reality’.

God’s existence cannot be proven or disproven via the scientific method. It’s not that people haven’t tried, it’s just logically impossible.

Atheism is therefore inconsistent with its own propositions. And this is why it inspires so little confidence.

It’s usually a reaction to religious hypocrisy and while primitive, for this reason it’s often the strong that flirt with it.

Atheists wrongly claim the moral high ground. Pointing at religion as a cause of war and suggesting atheism would solve this. However, the Soviet Union was openly atheist. Hardly a peace loving role model. Worse: both Capitalism and Marxism are fundamentally materialist ideologies.

Atheists often develop fundamentalist tendencies. Also they will often actively proselytize.

All in all, atheism as a belief system is not sufficient to defeat religion. That’s why Richard Dawkins, who made a career of denying God, recanted and went agnostic: simply not knowing, instead of denying.

This is indeed a reasonable stance. It’s realistic and maintains an open minded attitude.

Jesus And The Awakening

Jesus was no fan of Capitalism.

Jesus was no fan of Capitalism.

Interest in Jesus is definitely surging in the Truth Movement.

His reputation has seen a huge boost to at least some extent because of him taking the Usurers to the cleaners in the Temple.

It had been damaged after a few thousand years of Pharisees of all sorts of persuasions claiming they were speaking in his name.

It’s mainly because people are having a second look at the authentic Jesus, as opposed to the disfigured picture X-tianity was promoting.

And Jesus was the Great Prophet of the Spirit. The Life Breath that pervades all creation as Consciousness. And that lives in our hearts too and that wants us to come to Him, so He can give us Peace.

And more and more people are sensing this. In many different ways, via many different stories, books, words, traditions, experience.

And this is the real Awakening.