Geert Wilders lost the election, notwithstanding his anti EU rhetoric. The real opposition simply stayed home.
Only 38% of the Dutch electorate went to vote for the EU Parliament.
In 2005, the Netherlands voted with 62% against the referendum for the EU Constitution. This was famously ignored in the Lisbon treaty.
It looks like the same 62% stayed home yesterday.
The Telegraph is explaining low voter turn out with the bad economy.
But that masks a much deeper malaise: the EU simply lacks legitimacy.
Alexander Pechtold
Geert Wilders, expected to win the election, was defeated by a number of mainstream parties, including the D66, led by Bilderberger Pechtold, widely expected to be Holland’s next Prime Minister and the Christian Democrats, boring ‘centrist’ who have been at the heart of NWO policy implementation for decades.
Wilders was expected to do well, because of his anti-EU rhetoric. But it seems the real opposition saw the futility of voting. Voting, even for an ostensibly anti-EU party, is simply saying the system works.
Wilders, a fanatical Zionist, has been polluting the much needed anti mass immigration debate with virulent Islam bashing and more and more open racism. Recently, at a get together with his followers, he rhetorically asked: ‘Do you want more or less Moroccans?’, after which his people chanted: ‘Less! Less! Less!’.
While it keeps the chattering classes, including the Main Stream Media, busy, it just helps the divide and conquer game for which mass immigration exists to begin with.
These antics make him unacceptable to civilized people, disenfranchising them in this most crucial of issues and fracturing the opposition. Undoubtedly, this is the main reason why he exists and not to win elections and actually do something about both the EU and mass immigration. Both are fundamental in the NWO’s strategy.
England
Farage of England’s UKIP is a better campaigner, but he too has clear links to Zionist pressure groups. His economic policies are libertarian, promising only more hardship for his working class consituency. He, nor Wilders, will go even close to the monetary system. To his credit, he’s very lukewarm to both not-so-gay marriage and feminism.
But his main ‘raison d’etre’ seems to be to fracture the right: EU scepticism in Britain has been the Eurocrat’s (and Whitehall’s) bane for decades. It seems far from unlikely that, if UKIP continues to grow like it does, it will shatter Conservative election hopes. Labor can then bring Britain in the Euro and continue the rape of the British Isles with devastating mass immigration. Whites are expected to be a minority in only decades, with current immigration rates.
EU and Mass Immigration are One
The fight against the EU and mass immigration are indeed One: Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the Pan European Movement, Jewish, and considered by Eurocrats to have fathered the EU, insisted that a Pan European Movement needed mass immigration to destroy European Whites:
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution] “
But the EU is moving forward more due to inertia than anything else. The 2005 referendum (besides the Netherlands, France voted 55% no, Ireland 53% no) was never repeated. France and the Netherlands are core countries in the EU and they need our vote. They need us to love our slavery.
And this love is not forthcoming.
This is the crisis that the EU faces and that everybody, including the faux ‘opposition’ of the right, prefers to dance around.
For as long as they can afford it.
Also: Disagreeing With Krishnamurti…….
This article was written for Henry Makow.
Making Sense of the Senseless...... 
I’m glad I didn’t vote then …I didn’t know whether it was best to not vote, or to vote and make a new box saying :NONE of the above, but in the end I felt no inclination to go so went with that
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s no good just not voting, you need to get your strawman name off the electoral register and deny their assumptions that you have to fill in any census forms or any electoral roll forms.
LikeLike
Occultist, Alice Bailey, in her book Esoteric Healing:
“[in the Aryan race], which now dominates the planet, you have the first true appearance outwardly on the physical plane of the basic synthesis of humanity which will be—in its better form—so strikingly significant of the next major root race, the sixth. Inter-marriage between nations and races, the fusion of bloods for hundreds of years—due to migration, travel, education and mental unity—has led to there being no really pure racial types today. This is far more certainly the case than the most enlightened think, if the long, long history of mankind is considered. Sexual intercourse knows no impenetrable barriers, and people today have in them all the strains and the blood of all the races, and this (as a result of the world war, 1914-1945) will be increasingly the case.
This development is definitely a part of the divine plan, no matter how undesirable it may appear to those who idealise purity of relationship, or how ruthless its application is at the present moment. Something intended is being brought about and it cannot be avoided. The urge to mate becomes peculiarly strong when men are removed from their familiar settings and experience the novelty of complete loneliness, when the normal inhibitions and customs imposed by family relationships and national standards are removed, when danger of death is constantly faced and the larger value submerges the lesser values and the usual conventional attitudes, and when the physical organism has been trained and brought by scientific treatment and heavy feeding to the height of physical efficiency. I am speaking in terms of physical effectiveness and not of mental efficiency, which may or may not parallel the former.
The armies of the world are everywhere and are spread over every country; racial transmigration is a universal factor, both from the angle of military necessity and from the plight of the civilians who find themselves in the path of war. This movement of millions of men everywhere is one of the paramount factors which will condition the new civilisation, and its importance is based upon the fact that in twenty-five years’ time men and women will be a hybrid race whose fathers and mothers will be of every imaginable nation; white fathers will have had physical relation with women of every Asiatic or African origin, thus producing a fusion of blood which—if recognised and rightly handled and developed, from the educational angle and with understanding—will express in embryo the nature of the sixth root race, and which will be in fact HUMANITY without any racial or national barriers, with no so-called pure blood and exclusive castes, and with a new and virile sense of life because of the infusion of stronger stocks with the weaker or worn-out types and of the newer racial strains with the older and more developed.
I hold no brief for the manner in which this is being brought about. It could have happened without war and through a conviction that all men are equal and human, and that the mixture of races would solve many problems; war, however, has hastened the process and the soldiers of all the armies of the world are having physical relations with women of all races, all civilisations and all colours. This must, whether regarded as right or wrong according to the code of ethics and standards of the observer, produce an entirely new situation with which the world of the future will have to cope; it must inevitably break down national prejudices and racial barriers—the first producing more effect than the latter during the initial stages. Inevitably a more homogeneous humanity will appear during the changes of the next one hundred years. Many attitudes and many customary reactions which today hold sway will vanish, and types and qualities and characteristics for which we have as yet no precedent will appear upon a large scale.
Whether the conservative and the so-called strictly “moral” people dislike this worldwide happening has no bearing on the case. It has happened and is happening daily and will materially bring about far reaching changes. These inter-racial and mixed relationships have always happened upon a small and individual scale; they are now happening on a large scale. For the results of this due preparation must be made.”
Rene Guenon on the false spirituality of occult societies:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/René_Guénon#Contemporary_.22neo-spiritualism.22
LikeLiked by 1 person
another tell all quote………..
LikeLike
Actually I have tribal ancestry and trace my lineage back many generations and our elders teach us these names from a young age. My children’s old aunt sent them an email with the names of each ancestor and it is traced back to our main common clan. As an immigrant to Canada, albeit from a young age, I understand that immigration has it cool points and drawbacks and these stances are not necessarily racist. When I visit my homeland my father tells us how the peoples of a bordering nation have heavily settled in our tribal lands……that hurts. Ethnically we are dissimilar (yet look nearly similar) but no one appreciates being displaced. As a Muslim the stances of Wilder’s platform are Islamophobic, pro Zionist and culturally offensive. As AM points out you can save your culture without being extreme about it. You can tell your governments that you require major changes or decreases in immigration without being racist. Geert Wilders is just a uncultured bully who is fear mongering and I am well pleased that he has done poorly in the elections! As a Canadian I am happy that we have different concerns such as the necessity of reaching a learned immigrant group instead of opening the doors to everyone and I agree with this due to many social problems that I have experienced first hand with the difficulties faced by folks who are ill equipped for this society. However, I would add the caveat that the wars have to be stopped in order for immigration to lessen.Many folks would not be here if they were not being bombed over there literally and economically….:). Therefore, an anti war platform with a reform of immigration would be a viable platform in my opinion.
(Sorry about the long comment I usually like to keep it short but the gears are turning slowly today….:))
PS I enjoyed reading about the platform of Jobbik in Hungary:
http://budapesttimes.hu/2014/02/22/jobbik-to-wilders-and-le-pen-liberalism-and-zionism-are-the-enemies-not-islam/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anti War, Anti Immigration and Anti Usury/Banking, these are the three main negatives of a real Populist/Spiritual Platform.
Positively stated:
Acceptance of God as Creator of us and Natural Law, The Endo fo Capitalist Imperialism (ending the need for immigration too) through interest-free credit based monetary reform, closed borders and a cultural revival (which becomes possible through the end of capitalism and the ascent of an equitable economy).
LikeLike
As has been stated many times, take away all money from all people and within a finite time, the same people will have the same proportion of money earned under the new circumstances. I think the jew is behind this transformation, they figure as long as they have the money, they have the power. Wilders, jew that he is, clearly favors that jews remain as the stewards of all land, all money, and ALL.
LikeLike