The EU And Faux ‘Far Right Populism’

Geert Wilders lost the election, notwithstanding his anti EU rhetoric. The real opposition simply stayed home.

Geert Wilders lost the election, notwithstanding his anti EU rhetoric. The real opposition simply stayed home.

Only 38% of the Dutch electorate went to vote for the EU Parliament.

In 2005, the Netherlands voted with 62% against the referendum for the EU Constitution. This was famously ignored in the Lisbon treaty.

It looks like the same 62% stayed home yesterday.

The Telegraph is explaining low voter turn out with the bad economy.

But that masks a much deeper malaise: the EU simply lacks legitimacy.

Alexander Pechtold

Alexander Pechtold

Geert Wilders, expected to win the election, was defeated by a number of mainstream parties, including the D66, led by Bilderberger Pechtold, widely expected to be Holland’s next Prime Minister and the Christian Democrats, boring ‘centrist’ who have been at the heart of NWO policy implementation for decades.

Wilders was expected to do well, because of his anti-EU rhetoric. But it seems the real opposition saw the futility of voting. Voting, even for an ostensibly anti-EU party, is simply saying the system works.

Wilders, a fanatical Zionist, has been polluting the much needed anti mass immigration debate with virulent Islam bashing and more and more open racism. Recently, at a get together with his followers, he rhetorically asked: ‘Do you want more or less Moroccans?’, after which his people chanted: ‘Less! Less! Less!’.

While it keeps the chattering classes, including the Main Stream Media, busy, it just helps the divide and conquer game for which mass immigration exists to begin with.

These antics make him unacceptable to civilized people, disenfranchising them in this most crucial of issues and fracturing the opposition. Undoubtedly, this is the main reason why he exists and not to win elections and actually do something about both the EU and mass immigration. Both are fundamental in the NWO’s strategy.

England
Farage of England’s UKIP is a better campaigner, but he too has clear links to Zionist pressure groups. His economic policies are libertarian, promising only more hardship for his working class consituency. He, nor Wilders, will go even close to the monetary system. To his credit, he’s very lukewarm to both not-so-gay marriage and feminism.

But his main ‘raison d’etre’ seems to be to fracture the right: EU scepticism in Britain has been the Eurocrat’s (and Whitehall’s) bane for decades. It seems far from unlikely that, if UKIP continues to grow like it does, it will shatter Conservative election hopes. Labor can then bring Britain in the Euro and continue the rape of the British Isles with devastating mass immigration. Whites are expected to be a minority in only decades, with current immigration rates.

EU and Mass Immigration are One
The fight against the EU and mass immigration are indeed One: Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the Pan European Movement, Jewish, and considered by Eurocrats to have fathered the EU, insisted that a Pan European Movement needed mass immigration to destroy European Whites:
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution] “

But the EU is moving forward more due to inertia than anything else. The 2005 referendum (besides the Netherlands, France voted 55% no, Ireland 53% no) was never repeated. France and the Netherlands are core countries in the EU and they need our vote. They need us to love our slavery.

And this love is not forthcoming.

This is the crisis that the EU faces and that everybody, including the faux ‘opposition’ of the right, prefers to dance around.

For as long as they can afford it.

Photo

Also: Disagreeing With Krishnamurti…….

This article was written for Henry Makow.

Advertisements